Ancient History Revised
We have examined the Aryan invasion theory and seen how it has continually failed to prove
itself. It has tried to readjust itself to new evidence that has gradually undermined it
and now leaves nothing left to hold it up. Therefore we must look at the history of India
and the world in the light of the collapse of the invasion theory. The acceptance of a
Vedic nature to Harappan and pre-Harappan civilization creates a revolution in our view of
history, not just of India but of the entire world.
First it equates Indo-European peoples with one of the largest and oldest of ancient
civilizations not in Europe or the Middle East but in South Asia. The idea that the
Indo-Europeans were originally nomads or primitive in culture and took over civilization
from the people of the Middle East is thereby called into question. The Indo-Europeans
appear as early and independent inventors of civilization of a sophisticated urban basis
by the third millennium BC. This suggests a greater antiquity and sophistication for other
Indo-European cultures, those of Europe, the Middle East and Central Asia. The origins of
European culture may lie not with the ancient Greeks but with the Hindus and be found in
the Vedas, not as the record of nomadic Indo-European culture but of early Indo-European
Second it turns the ancient Vedas of India into an authentic record of a culture at least
as old as the third millennium BC. As the Vedic literary record is very large, it
indicates that we retain a priceless treasure, a well preserved literary record from our
ancient ancestors over four thousand years old, complete with accents and commentaries.
The Vedas are chanted by Brahmins today much as they were over four thousand years ago in
the Indus-Sarasvati culture. We could only compare this to the condition if ancient
Egyptian teachings still being chanted today in modern Egypt. This means that the Vedas
should be examined by all people who wish to truly understand ancient humanity. It
requires a reexamination of the Vedas and taking their statements seriously when they
speak of the vastness and sophisticated nature of their culture.
Third it makes Vedic India perhaps the oldest, largest and most central of the world's
cultures. Some have proposed that the Harappan culture is the oldest in the world because
of its size and uniformity. That this culture was able to preserve its continuity would
add much weight to the argument. This would require that we must reexamine Vedic India to
understand the root of civilization from which we have developed, or perhaps fallen.
In this regard the great Dravidian and Munda (aboriginal) connections inherent in the
Vedas and in ancient India need to be examined. Not only does this reinterpretation of the
Vedas push Indo-European civilization back further, it also breaks down the divide between
Indo-European and other cultures. Vedic literature may therefore allow us to link up many
ancient cultures and see the greater commonality of ancient civilization.
Fourth it indicates that traditional literature and ancient calendars all over the world
have to be taken more seriously, not only Hindu but Chinese, Mayan and others. It shows
that the ancients are not as bad historians as we have thought, but that we are bad
interpreters of their literature. It would require a totally different look at the ancient